Arguments Based on Faith

Not to pick on Weir (see my earlier post), but he also says that, on principle, arguments based on faith and ideology are not arguments but beliefs.

Please! Stop! All arguments are based on faith or ideology! All of them! It is a necessary condition of knowing something that the knower believe it!

As I learned it in philosophy class, to know something means
1. it is true
2. I believe it
3. A. it needs no proof (math/logic/a definition/perfect accuracy but immaterial)
3. B. I have proof beyond a reasonable doubt (sense data of any kind, which is always fallible)

If anyone argues he knows something, he is saying, by definition, that the proof supports his belief and is true. That is what knowledge is.


What's on your mind?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Blog at

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: